Відео

Oumuamua 54 mp/s, Hailey´s Comet 54.55mp/s taking 75-76 years per turn. Accelerating getting closer to high gravity of our sun? Oh no, how is gravitational pull able to accelerate a SMAL TINY OBJECT 😱 Physics sure can´t explain how that is possible 😰 The use of swing-by procedures is just a conspericy and never were done! Sure 😂

UA-cam is flooded by cheap AI bullshit videos like this ^

The JAMESTOWN Space Telescope? Wut dat? Is that the one sent up by the Pilgrims?

They're coming back to kill and eat us all and repopulate the earth

It's ironic that the James Webb Telescope can peer into space for millions of miles, even light-years, and yet it has never captured a single UFO. Despite the vast distances it has surveyed, not one UFO has been spotted zooming through our galaxy or any other. It certainly gives one pause for thought, doesn't it?

How do you say, " B U L L C R A P "?

This AI crap is getting real old really fast.

Ok I have to ask...what exactly is the "James wood telescope"...your robo guy keeps saying that.

heard of the containment theory?

the universe doesn't have an edge

This is pretty cool

ye right I totally believe this

Poor English sentence structure but interesting topic

First☝️

Your video is like a breath of fresh air in the UA-cam landscape. The authenticity and genuineness with which you present your content are rare and much appreciated. I love how you approach the topic with a balanced perspective, leaving room for viewers to form their own opinions. Your engaging storytelling kept me hooked, and I was captivated from start

There is no such thing as a "gravity assist". That is the fakest idea I ever heard. How can gravity push an object away. Gravity ALWAYS pulls objects closer. More lies from phony low IQ "scientists". I am tempted to say we never got anything further than the moon.

First time viewer here. I love space and astronomy and videos like these are often a treat for me. However, I wanted to give you my thoughts on why I will not subscribe to your channel: 1) using text-to-speech generation as narrator. Please don't do this. Get a voice actor or someone you know to do the narrating. It's very evident and quite distracting hearing the narrator intonate sentences midway thru to pause and continue that same sentence as if there was punctuation. If you're really stuck with using AI voice for these, then give it your attention to proofread and ensure that the voice follows what the text is saying. That is the very least you can do otherwise it just seems lazy. Anyone can slap a voice on copied text over common use stock video clips, and there are plenty who do just that, so yours has to stand out and have good quality. 2) stop pestering with distracting overlays to Like or Subscribe. They don't work and if anything it drives viewers away, especially if the narration is sloppy. With that said, the graphics in the video itself were neat, some questionable scenes completely unrealistic but neat nonetheless.

They know god is going to reap havoc the world after 7 year after 4/8/2024 REPENT ppl god is giving us time

Why can't a bomb be placed on an Elon Musk rocket and have it explode near the object to change it's course? Why five years?

We are worried about 💫 & mega &large 💫

I am worried about mega 💫

NASA has a plan to study the 💫 to save planet earth 🌏

Our famous ancestor Lucy? My only famous ancestor(s) were Adam & Eve

Bad AI junk

Wow only 10 Australian dollars away from our earth! Did AI right this, as well as narrate it?

hmm it seems like they need to start using atomic bomb to protect the planet...

All material born when gasses make star, but where does gasses born, gold made from combining gasses

Did someone attack the narrator in the middle? It was hard to make sense of the sentences.

Junk channel. Enough actual science to sound plausible interspersed with gibberish.

Another terrible AI video. AI voice. ChatGPT script. Stock video. UA-cam needs to put a stop to this or pretty soon there will be nothing left but this kind of garbage.

Flat earth with a dome, waters above the dome. Sun moon stars are luminaries

We are living organisms living in a bigger living organism.

Well we found the edge of the universe "A Bubble In A Bubble"

7:44 44 BILLION** PLEASE STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION

7:29 WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT????? SAGITTARIUS A IS MILLIONS OF TIMES THE MASS OF THE SUN AND SEVERAL TIMES BIGGER THAN IT

7:03 literally what the hell are you talking about?????? its literally a billion times the mass of the sun and it is much, MUCH bigger than the solar system

Stop going on the cheap with the AI voice over. Get a real person to speak so the words can be better understood. Do this video with a real person then compare the two.

If we think of a galaxy as a PINWHEEL or something they have an absolute zero core where TIME STOPS and matter is compressed beyond the atoms capabilities to resist with forces like the weak and strong nuclear forces. So that means it’s a condensate with an average density similar to a metallic liquid with no movement allowed. A SUBCOOLED SUPERFLUID. Anything caught up in the superfluids gravity cannot escape. Light can’t escape the event horizon because it pulls space time around it making it curve as the cosmological constant is slid over displacement places entropy, causation, and temperature in general OUTSIDE that region. So when we see them boiling, space is quite a bit hotter than the core. Any mass will be spun around the core from angular momentum and eventually get pulled in. Many times hotter than the sun outside and no molecular motion inside. So that creates a STORM. Heat chasing cold charges up masses and makes a flow. Thermodynamics is probably holding our galaxies together along with gravity being a catalyst, energy flow holds it right in place as these hole cores blow out our universes edge by displacement. All the mass we see out there TAKES UP SPACE. When we began we were hot and dense, but we grew in VOLUME. But why? Solidification and condensation means WE NEED MORE ROOM. By filling up areas with mass space has no choice but to EXPAND. Expansion from displacement of the cosmological constant increases volume overall.”

I think singularities are all around and even within me but yet all seems like normal space-time... except when it doesn't.

This is plagiarized from PBS Space Time

up to 2 min its spams only statisicks. Fcking klick bait

Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. A graph illustrates the squared nature of the phenomenon, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the "missing mass" is dilated mass. To date, it has been confirmed in 6 very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter. This is because they don't have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal. There was clarity in astronomy before television and movies began to popularize singularities in the 1960's. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that they cannot exist. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.

is this ai content?

So the space inside the ring is normal-ish space. If the ring acquires more matter, the space would expand, yah? Sounds so much like our universe is the inside of a black hole. There's another recent paper that suggests our universe has collided with other universes: read other black holes. The "great attractor" is the ring, and no need for dark energy perhaps? Anybody who understands this, can you comment on the flatness of our universe vs the theorized space in the center?

ꍌꄲ꒯, ꉣ꒒ꏂꋬꇙꏂ ꏂꉧꉔ꒤ꇙꏂ ꂵꏂ ꅐꁝꌦ ꒐'ꂵ ꉔ꒤ꋪꇙꏂ꒯ ꃳꌦ ꓄ꁝꏂꇙꏂ ꃳ꒤ꇙ꓄ꋬꇙ? ꒻꒐ꋊꋊꇙ ꂵꋬ꒯ꏂ ꋬ ꋊ꒐ꍌꍌꋬ ꀘ꒐꒒꒒, ꋊꄲꅐ ꒐ ꁝꋬ꒦ꏂ ꓄ꄲ ꇙ꒤ꊰꊰꏂꋪ

Nasa misspelled Galactus as Galactofage

Galactus, is that you?

As the mist droplets above my head are too light to overcome the resistance of breezes and temperature lift to fall onto me, until such a time when it overcomes the plateau necessary to allow gravity to act.

downvote for the ghetto narrator

The AI voice errors destroyed this video lol